.
Feedback

King County Council OKs $20 Car Tab Fee Increase

Nearly six hours of negotiations on Monday ends with 7-2 Council vote to approve the car tab increase to maintain current Metro bus service. The new $20 fee will go into effect in early 2012.

After hours of negotiations, the Metropolitan King County Council voted Monday evening 7-2 to by $20 in the county to spare a 17 percent cut in Metro bus service.

King County Executive Dow Constantine, who pushed the idea to save 600,000 hours of bus service, praised the seven Councilmembers who supported the measure, including Republicans Kathy Lambert and Jane Hague, who joined the effort late last week. 

Despite their support Friday, debate continued Monday, with Lambert and Hague, both Eastside Councilmembers, wavering, and at times looked to be changing their minds back to no again, according to Publicola, which live blogged the hearing. But in the end the key votes were there to get a 6-vote supermajority, from Lambert and Hague.

The bipartisan, multi-pronged transit funding plan maintains current transit service levels while providing transportation alternatives for commuters who may see a reduction in bus service in their communities.

“The new CRC package that the Council adopted today will directly benefit my constituents on the Eastside,” said Hague, the Council Vice Chair. “In this era of partisan bickering at the federal level, we at King County have bucked the trend.  Thanks to efforts made on both sides of the aisle, this new legislation offers real reform for Metro. More importantly it creates jobs, and keeps businesses and people moving.” 

Lambert also spoke in support of the fee.

“No one wants a new fee, but the alternative is far worse,” said Councilmember Kathy Lambert. “Without interim funding, cuts to bus service will be substantial, particularly in the lower-density neighborhoods on the Eastside. This will put more cars on the road, clogging our freeways and bridges and leaving all of us idling in standstill traffic. Without this compromise on funding for Metro, we all would pay more for gas, spend more time commuting, and lose some of our quality of life. Transit cuts of this magnitude will further undercut our fragile economy, and we can’t afford that risk. I am proud that this compromise agreement will return value to our citizens.” 

Meanwhile, Councilmembers Reagan Dunn and Pete von Reichbauer expressed disappointment with the decision because they wanted to voters to decide the issue.

"I'm deeply disappointed that the majority of my colleagues found it necessary to deny the people the right to vote on this very important matter," said Councilmember Reagan Dunn, chair of the Council's Regional Transit Committee. "There have been numerous votes on car tabs through the years and the people expect to have a say."

The funding plan includes adoption of the $20 Congestion Reduction Charge (CRC), a temporary charge on vehicle licenses for each of the next two years. 

It will go in effect in early 2012.

People packed public hearings to support the fee and keep bus service.

“Thousands of people testified in front of us, wrote in, or called asking us to save buses, not only for themselves but for the transit dependent members of our community," Councilmember Larry Gossett said. "Today’s vote tells them we listened.”

Metro faced a $1.2 billion shortfall between revenues they’re collecting and what is needed to sustain the transit system between 2009 and 2013. Efficiencies, reforms, fare increases, layoffs, COLA givebacks, and tapping reserves have allowed Metro to close $900 million of that $1.2 billion problem. Transit operators accepted COLA givebacks and other concessions that will save $17 million annually.

Bus riders are paying 80 percent higher fares, which translates to an additional $500 annually per daily rider. Due to the dramatic recession-driven drop in sales tax revenues, Metro Transit is facing a $60 million annual deficit between revenues and the cost of providing current levels of transit service. That shortfall will require Metro to shrink service by 600,000 hours of annual bus service over the next two years, or 17 percent of the entire system. The Congestion Reduction Charge was authorized by the State Legislature during its 2011 session as an option to assist King County in maintaining its transit service levels. Engrossed Substitute Senate (ESSB) Bill 5457 provides a new local option for temporary transit funding of a Congestion Reduction Charge of up to $20 on each vehicle license renewal in King County.  The charge can only be instituted for a period of two years. The CRC is estimated to generate a two-year total of approximately $50 million for Metro Transit service. In combination with the use of reserves and other one-time measures, the CRC will provide for more stable transit revenue conditions for the Executive's 2012-2013 Proposed Budget. 

“The action taken by the Council today ensures that bus service will be maintained for hundreds of thousands of King County residents who rely on Metro transit to get around,” said King County Councilmember Julia Patterson, Chair of the Council's Budget and Fiscal Management Committee. “With the Congestion Reduction Charge, Metro will be able to avoid large service reductions in the next two years that would have left bus riders, quite literally, standing out in the cold.” 

Councilmember Bob Ferguson also supported the fee early on.

“As a regular bus commuter on the #41, I understand the importance of bus service to our region and our economy,” Ferguson said. “I look forward to sharing the good news with my fellow bus commuters on my way home this evening.” 

The adopted ordinance includes a Transit Incentive Program to encourage drivers to use public transportation. Car owners will be eligible to receive eight bus tickets worth up to $24 in exchange for each car tab renewal. Individuals can use the tickets for bus rides to work, play or a special event. Or they can choose to donate the value of those tickets for distribution by select human service agencies.

The funding plan will also includes implementing different types of transit services for riders who depend on routes that serve lower-density areas. As part of the adopted Transit Strategic Plan, the Council directed Metro to move ahead with strategies for introducing more cost effective transit services on some lower ridership routes currently served by buses. But rather than eliminating transit service altogether in these communities, the adopted plan calls on Metro to explore alternatives that ensure that public transit will be available when needed—such as Dial-a-Ride Transit service (DART), community access transportation services, Vanpools and vanshares. 

The coming of tolls on SR-520, the Alaskan Way Viaduct and potentially other corridors, is taken into consideration as part of the adopted plan. The plan includes language calling for routes which carry more riders due to the effect of highway tolling as candidates for added service to maintain the quality of existing service as directed by the Transit strategic plan.The plan also calls for increasing revenues by eliminating the Ride Free Area (RFA) between Jackson and Battery Streets and in the Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel starting in October 2012.

The elimination of the Ride Free Area will generate an additional $2.2 million in revenue for Metro. A service started in 1973 to encourage retail development in the downtown Seattle business core has become a money loser for King County. In 2009, a financial audit performed by the County Auditor recommended that Metro update its formula for collecting revenues in the RFA. Reimbursements from the city of Seattle have also failed to keep pace with ridership growth and fare increases. 

To assist those who may be impacted by the loss of the Ride Free Area, the County will investigate either increasing the number of transit tickets allocated to human service and homeless programs, or reduce the cost these agencies pay when purchasing for transit tickets.

Council members said public response—both those supporting the implementation of the Congestion Reduction Charge and a number of people who question the need for the charge—had a role in the adopted legislation. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Renton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
The Old Renton Library joins its place in history.  This quilt hangs in the Old Downtown Renton Post Office.
D. Charles May 23, 2013 at 07:36 am
The whole library deal is a really sorry chapter in the history of the City of Renton government andRead More we are far from resolution. The perpetrators continue to soil themselves time and time again oblivious to the long-term damage they are creating. After the dramatic act of civil disobedience at the KCLS library design unveiling where 85% of the overflow crowd refused to go to the "Stations", KCLS and the City of Renton retaliated by voting to pass a design sent to the council late on a Friday, likely reviewed by the Council the following Monday for less than a couple of hours. The fact that the revised design was not properly vetted with public input displays the appalling disregard the current City of Renton government has towards its citizens. In a few months we will be able to remove those from office who refuse to allow meaningful public participation in matters of great concern to the public.
Richard Bray May 10, 2013 at 02:00 am
The City Council recommended to KCLS that a Library Entrance over the Cedar River be kept. I lookRead More forward to KCLS acting upon this recommendation about what our community has asked for all along--a library that we can be proud of.
Kendall Watson (Editor) April 19, 2013 at 04:46 pm
@rentonben it may be pleasing to the sense of aesthetics, but maintaining food at room temperatureRead More for too long (2 hours) is potentially dangerous, according to the CDC. The CDC also reports that each year, about 1 in 6 Americans (or 48 million people) gets sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases — which it characterizes as a "preventable health problem" http://www.cdc.gov/features/befoodsafe/
rentonben April 19, 2013 at 03:19 pm
The one regulation that stood out to me as being particularly "American" is the one aboutRead More noodles "not being cold enough." I've been all over Asia and Europe, and leaving noodles out in room temperature is generally considered the right way to protect their texture and flavor. I almost don't want to comment on this story, as I don't want to bring a spotlight on these good people minor problems. I'm more that willing to give them a second chance.
Kendall Watson (Editor) April 18, 2013 at 06:42 pm
Very interesting, Rentonben. They sell food in a similar way in the Philippines at roadside placesRead More called "carinderias". But those places that are keeping food out with no control over temperature appeared to be very much "at your own risk" sorts of places (things tend to be very much less "regulated" in the PI). If we didn't see them bringing out the food from the kitchen to the table or tray at these places, we avoided them, as we had no idea how long the food had sat out in the afternoon shade. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actually urges avoiding these establishments altogether. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/destinations/philippines.htm
Richard Bray April 12, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Great letter David! As you said we expect that a reasonable priced, full size library basic designRead More will be among the ones and that KCLS will present on Monday. Residents expect to be treated with respect by KCLS.
Sara M. DuBois April 12, 2013 at 07:56 am
Well put, David Keyes, well written. I sincerely hope that Renton's Mayor Law and the City CouncilRead More are considering all that Mr. Keyes has stated, remembering that their constituents here in Renton are the most important ones to continue considering. That KCLS's Board of Trustees is only secondary to we citizens, because we arw the ones that must ultimately be satisfied with the results of these alternative plans.
Michelle Peterson April 12, 2013 at 12:33 am
The KCLS is a fabulous catalog and resource to our family. I never had access to any of the materialRead More I regularly access today, thanks to the anexation. I have borrowed books for research on Sanskrit and Yoga that have come from far reaches of the county. My family has enjoyed music and movies that we otherwise never would have. I have listened to many audio books while walking my dogs hours and hours around this beautiful city. I love being a part of the King Co Library System and would be truely heartbroken were we to loose it. Renton has never had such resources alone as we do being a part of a greater system. Please, please, please, keep KCLS. It's the catalog, not the building that matters!!
Dave Beedon April 9, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Good letter, Stuart. I hope the City and KCLS can get together to solve this issue.
mthrship March 25, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Hi Kerrick, Strangely enough, this plan looks like they took the BIG 5 plan and tried to fit itRead More onto the deck of the current library. Many of the items talked about in the Renton Reporter article aren't the only way to go. And, that article seems to be a direct response to residents protesting KCLS' high-handed and money-wasting tactics. As usual, KCLS has given residents one solution. And, it's the one KCLS said they most feared! Why drizzle on and on about avoiding environmental impact and then produce a design that's not only a dead loss for residents in terms of service area and stack space, but will set off every flag KCLS wanted to avoid? Because they're not dealing in good faith with Renton. On the face of it this design looks like a very real attempt to walk away from what voters said they clearly wanted. KCLS is trying to make the possible impossible and has given no valid rationale to date.
Dave Beedon March 24, 2013 at 02:30 am
The City of Renton must pay for building or renovating its its two libraries. KCLS is in charge ofRead More developing new building designs. KCLS should be concerned about the opinions of the people paying for the new library, but it is ignoring the two critical design issues (space and entrance) mentioned repeatedly by residents. Is this “serving the public interest”? The proposed design eliminates about 30% of the current floor space by demolishing the section abutting the pedestrian bridge. That eliminates the entrance over the river and affects the space available for services. What becomes of the delightful children’s area if that portion of the building is demolished? The building would better serve the community if it added meeting rooms and study rooms. More computers might also be beneficial. But how can these things be provided if the library is made smaller? The City will either accept or reject the proposed building design next week, after KCLS’s Open House on the 26th. A majority of the City Council has not shown support for our concerns about the library. If you want your tax money spent well, please come to the City Council meeting on Monday, March 25 and tell the City that it must reject KCLS’s proposed building design. If you don’t want the library’s wonderful character destroyed, come to KCLS’s Open House at the library on Tuesday the 26th and stand up to an organization whose motto could be “we have to ruin the library to improve it.”
David A. Keyes March 24, 2013 at 12:57 am
Kerrick is spot on with her points here! Her single letter describes accurately and eloquently moreRead More reasons for you to attend Monday's Council Mtg & Tuesday's "design presentation" than KCLS's Ptacek and his ill-informed 'communications' specialist could distort or diminish in twenty interviews to the local rag. By the way, the drawings Kerrick references were delivered to the City three weeks ago on 3/1, and titled, in part, "...100% SD". "SD" standing for Schematic Design. These are scaled drawings the architecture and engineering consultants have workied on since at least early November. The submission is significant enough that, if accepted by our City Council, it will establish "Final Design" direction under the ILA, for the remainder of the project. Ask yourself why KCLS Director Ptacek and his staffer, Ms. Brand, would claim in the Reporter interview that this work to be presented Tuesday is "nowhere near the design phase."? Is it possible that they simply want to assuage your concerns? Or that by doing so, imply you really need not bother to attend...? ATTEND! ASK questions of the consultants! If the response given is no answer or makes no sense, say so and REPEAT THE QUESTION!. Ask what ALTERNATIVE solutions were explored! Do not accept for a moment any statement that your question will be answered at to a later date. Presently we own this Library. It is still ours. As Taxpayers, WE are the ones paying for the decisions of KCLS & Council .