.
Feedback

Consumer Alert: Pacific Coast Salad Kits Sold At Fred Meyer Recalled

The Oregon company has voluntarily recalled a number of salads for potential lysteria contamination, though no illnesses have been reported, the FDA said.

Pacific Coast Fruit Company, Portland, Ore., is voluntarily recalling multiple types of bagged processed salads based on the potential contamination of Listeria monocytogenes, an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems, though no illnesses have been reported in association with its products. Although healthy individuals may suffer only short-term symptoms such as high fever, severe headache, stiffness, nausea, abdominal pain and diarrhea, Listeria infection can cause miscarriages and stillbirths among pregnant women. 

The recall is spurred by an expanding nationwide recall by River Ranch Fresh Foods of Salinas, Calif., which supplies Pacific Coast, among others. River Ranch also says there have been no reported illnesses associated with this recall, according to the recall alert. The River Ranch recall includes products with best buy dates reading 12MAY2012 – 29MAY2012 or Julian dates 118 or 125. According to the recall list, products from the company sold in Washington are under the label River Ranch.

Pacific Coast Fruit utilized a portion of the salads that were recalled by River Ranch in some of its retail and food service processed bagged salad. The following list from Pacific Coast includes the UPC code, Pacific Coast Fruit Item Number, and Best if Use By Date or Production Date of items that are distributed to stores in Washington such as Fred Meyer. 

Pacific Coast recalled products were distributed to Fred Meyer, Avanti, and Evergreen in Oregon, Washington, Alaska and Idaho. 

The recalled retail salads are packed in a 9.6oz -10oz clamshell style and VA food service items is packed in 5 lbs – 20 lbs food service salads bags. 

The voluntary recalls are being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 

Consumers who have purchased this product should not consume it and are urged to return it to the place of purchase or destroy the product. Consumer with questions can contact Pacific Coast Fruit at 503-234-6411 between the hours of 8 am-4:30 pm PST Monday to Friday.

 

Pacific Coast Fruit Recalls Retail Salads

Brand

UPC Code

Item Number

Description

Date Indicator

Date Range For Recall

Chef on the Run

20728 71136

71136

Garden Salad 9.6 oz

Best if Used By

May 17 to May25

Mio Fratello

20728 71164

71164

Garden Salad 9.6 oz

Best if Used By

May 17 to May25

Mio Fratello 

20728 71600

71600

Deluxe Salad w Ranch Dressing 10oz

Best if Used By

May 16 to May26

Mio Fratello

20728 71601

71601

Deluxe Salad w Ranch Dressing 10oz

Best if Used By

May 16 to May26

Mio Fratello

20728 71602

71602

Deluxe Salad w Balsamic Dressing 10oz

Best if Used By

May 16 to May26

Mio Fratello

20728 71603

71603

Deluxe Salad w 1000 Island Dressing 10oz

Best if Used By

May 16 to May26

Pacific Coast Fruit VA Foodservice Salads Kits

UPC Code

Item Number

Description

Date Indicator

Date Range For Recall

20728 73065

73065

VA leaf Rom1/5# & Ice 1/5# (1/8” Shred) FMD    10 lbs

Best if Used By

May 15 to May25

20728 73066

73066

VA Leaf Rom 2/5# & Ice 2/5# (1/8” Shred) FMD    20 lbs

Best if Used By

May 15 to May25

20728 74012

74012

VA Salad Mix “Buffalo GAP” (G&Rleaf/Car/RCAB) 4/5#     20 lbs

Best if Used By

May 15 to May25

20728 74197

74197

VA Cabbage Green /Red 1/4x2 Shred 5#  5 lbs

Best if Used By

May 15 to May25

20728 74149

74149

VA Cabbage Red ¼” Shred 5#  5 lbs

Production Date

051012 to 051812

20728 74199

74199

VA Cabbage Green/Red w/Carrot Shred 5#  5 lbs

Production Date

051012 to 051812

20728 74129

74129

VA Cabbage Shred w/Colors 5 #  5 lbs

Production Date

050612 to 051812

For the complete list of River Ranch products recalled to date, follow this link to the FDA.

*Editor's Note: Information provided by the FDA.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Renton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Bray May 10, 2013 at 02:00 am
The City Council recommended to KCLS that a Library Entrance over the Cedar River be kept. I lookRead More forward to KCLS acting upon this recommendation about what our community has asked for all along--a library that we can be proud of.
Kendall Watson (Editor) April 19, 2013 at 04:46 pm
@rentonben it may be pleasing to the sense of aesthetics, but maintaining food at room temperatureRead More for too long (2 hours) is potentially dangerous, according to the CDC. The CDC also reports that each year, about 1 in 6 Americans (or 48 million people) gets sick, 128,000 are hospitalized, and 3,000 die of foodborne diseases — which it characterizes as a "preventable health problem" http://www.cdc.gov/features/befoodsafe/
rentonben April 19, 2013 at 03:19 pm
The one regulation that stood out to me as being particularly "American" is the one aboutRead More noodles "not being cold enough." I've been all over Asia and Europe, and leaving noodles out in room temperature is generally considered the right way to protect their texture and flavor. I almost don't want to comment on this story, as I don't want to bring a spotlight on these good people minor problems. I'm more that willing to give them a second chance.
Kendall Watson (Editor) April 18, 2013 at 06:42 pm
Very interesting, Rentonben. They sell food in a similar way in the Philippines at roadside placesRead More called "carinderias". But those places that are keeping food out with no control over temperature appeared to be very much "at your own risk" sorts of places (things tend to be very much less "regulated" in the PI). If we didn't see them bringing out the food from the kitchen to the table or tray at these places, we avoided them, as we had no idea how long the food had sat out in the afternoon shade. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) actually urges avoiding these establishments altogether. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/destinations/philippines.htm
Richard Bray April 12, 2013 at 05:20 pm
Great letter David! As you said we expect that a reasonable priced, full size library basic designRead More will be among the ones and that KCLS will present on Monday. Residents expect to be treated with respect by KCLS.
Sara M. DuBois April 12, 2013 at 07:56 am
Well put, David Keyes, well written. I sincerely hope that Renton's Mayor Law and the City CouncilRead More are considering all that Mr. Keyes has stated, remembering that their constituents here in Renton are the most important ones to continue considering. That KCLS's Board of Trustees is only secondary to we citizens, because we arw the ones that must ultimately be satisfied with the results of these alternative plans.
Michelle Peterson April 12, 2013 at 12:33 am
The KCLS is a fabulous catalog and resource to our family. I never had access to any of the materialRead More I regularly access today, thanks to the anexation. I have borrowed books for research on Sanskrit and Yoga that have come from far reaches of the county. My family has enjoyed music and movies that we otherwise never would have. I have listened to many audio books while walking my dogs hours and hours around this beautiful city. I love being a part of the King Co Library System and would be truely heartbroken were we to loose it. Renton has never had such resources alone as we do being a part of a greater system. Please, please, please, keep KCLS. It's the catalog, not the building that matters!!
Dave Beedon April 9, 2013 at 06:31 pm
Good letter, Stuart. I hope the City and KCLS can get together to solve this issue.
mthrship March 25, 2013 at 12:51 pm
Hi Kerrick, Strangely enough, this plan looks like they took the BIG 5 plan and tried to fit itRead More onto the deck of the current library. Many of the items talked about in the Renton Reporter article aren't the only way to go. And, that article seems to be a direct response to residents protesting KCLS' high-handed and money-wasting tactics. As usual, KCLS has given residents one solution. And, it's the one KCLS said they most feared! Why drizzle on and on about avoiding environmental impact and then produce a design that's not only a dead loss for residents in terms of service area and stack space, but will set off every flag KCLS wanted to avoid? Because they're not dealing in good faith with Renton. On the face of it this design looks like a very real attempt to walk away from what voters said they clearly wanted. KCLS is trying to make the possible impossible and has given no valid rationale to date.
Dave Beedon March 24, 2013 at 02:30 am
The City of Renton must pay for building or renovating its its two libraries. KCLS is in charge ofRead More developing new building designs. KCLS should be concerned about the opinions of the people paying for the new library, but it is ignoring the two critical design issues (space and entrance) mentioned repeatedly by residents. Is this “serving the public interest”? The proposed design eliminates about 30% of the current floor space by demolishing the section abutting the pedestrian bridge. That eliminates the entrance over the river and affects the space available for services. What becomes of the delightful children’s area if that portion of the building is demolished? The building would better serve the community if it added meeting rooms and study rooms. More computers might also be beneficial. But how can these things be provided if the library is made smaller? The City will either accept or reject the proposed building design next week, after KCLS’s Open House on the 26th. A majority of the City Council has not shown support for our concerns about the library. If you want your tax money spent well, please come to the City Council meeting on Monday, March 25 and tell the City that it must reject KCLS’s proposed building design. If you don’t want the library’s wonderful character destroyed, come to KCLS’s Open House at the library on Tuesday the 26th and stand up to an organization whose motto could be “we have to ruin the library to improve it.”
David A. Keyes March 24, 2013 at 12:57 am
Kerrick is spot on with her points here! Her single letter describes accurately and eloquently moreRead More reasons for you to attend Monday's Council Mtg & Tuesday's "design presentation" than KCLS's Ptacek and his ill-informed 'communications' specialist could distort or diminish in twenty interviews to the local rag. By the way, the drawings Kerrick references were delivered to the City three weeks ago on 3/1, and titled, in part, "...100% SD". "SD" standing for Schematic Design. These are scaled drawings the architecture and engineering consultants have workied on since at least early November. The submission is significant enough that, if accepted by our City Council, it will establish "Final Design" direction under the ILA, for the remainder of the project. Ask yourself why KCLS Director Ptacek and his staffer, Ms. Brand, would claim in the Reporter interview that this work to be presented Tuesday is "nowhere near the design phase."? Is it possible that they simply want to assuage your concerns? Or that by doing so, imply you really need not bother to attend...? ATTEND! ASK questions of the consultants! If the response given is no answer or makes no sense, say so and REPEAT THE QUESTION!. Ask what ALTERNATIVE solutions were explored! Do not accept for a moment any statement that your question will be answered at to a later date. Presently we own this Library. It is still ours. As Taxpayers, WE are the ones paying for the decisions of KCLS & Council .